The most ordinally-egalitarian of random voting rules
نویسنده
چکیده
Aziz and Stursberg [1] propose an “Egalitarian Simultaneous Reservation”rule (ESR), a generalization of Serial rule, one of the most discussed mechanisms in random assignment problem, to the more general random social choice domain. We provide an alternative definition, or characterization, of ESR as the unique most ordinally-egalitarian one. Specifically, given a lottery p over alternatives, for each agent i we define tpi (k) to be the total share in p of objects from her first k indifference classes. ESR is shown to be the unique one which leximin maximizes the vector of all such shares (tpi (k))i,k. Serial rule is known to be characterized by the same property (see [2]). Thus, we provide an alternative way to show that ESR, indeed, coincides with Serial rule on the assignment domain. Moreover, since both rules are defined as the unique most ordinally-egalitarian ones, out result shows that ESR is “the right way”to think about generalizing Serial rule.
منابع مشابه
Egalitarianism in the rank aggregation problem: a new dimension for democracy
Winner selection by majority, in elections between two candidates, is the only rule compatible with democratic principles. Instead, when candidates are three or more and voters rank candidates in order of preference, there are no univocal criteria for the selection of the winning (consensus) ranking and the outcome is known to depend sensibly on the adopted rule. Building upon XVIII century Con...
متن کاملIncentive-Compatible Voting Rules with Positively Correlated Beliefs
We study the consequences of positive correlation of beliefs in the design of voting rules in a model with an arbitrary number of voters. We propose a notion of positive correlation, based on the likelihood of agreement of the k best alternatives (for any k) of two orders called TS correlation. We characterize the set of Ordinally Bayesian Incentive-Compatible (OBIC) (d’Aspremont and Peleg (198...
متن کاملManipulation of Hamming-based Approval Voting for Multiple Referenda and Committee Elections
Several methods exist for electing committees of representatives and conducting multiple referenda based on approval voting. Recently, a family of rules for approval-based voting using ordered weighted averaging was proposed in [1], ranging from a simple candidate-wise majority (minisum) to egalitarian rule (minimax). Even though the first rule is strategyproof and the second is not, due to its...
متن کاملA Generalization of Probabilistic Serial to Randomized Social Choice
The probabilistic serial rule is one of the most wellestablished and desirable rules for the random assignment problem. We present the egalitarian simultaneous reservation social decision scheme — an extension of probabilistic serial to the more general setting of randomized social choice. We consider various desirable fairness, efficiency, and strategic properties of social decision schemes an...
متن کاملStatistical Robustness of Voting Rules
We introduce a notion of “statistical robustness” for voting rules. We say that a voting rule is statistically robust if the winner for a profile of ballots is most likely to be the winner of any random sample of the profile, for any positive sample size. We show that some voting rules, such as plurality, veto, and random ballot, are statistically robust, while others, such as approval, score v...
متن کامل